roofy

63 Columbia Street

Brooklyn, NY 11201BBL 3-00299-0008Map

Owner of record: Sds Colcon Owner, LLC

63 Columbia Street is a walk-up apartment building built in 2020 in Brooklyn, 11201. It has 11 residential units across 5 floors. The owner of record is Sds Colcon Owner, LLC. HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

HPD violations
0
DOB violations
4
ECB violations
37
HPD complaints
2

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
No HPD violations

HPD has not cited this building.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

No rent-stabilized units in 2018–2024 tax bills

Some apartments can still be regulated. Use the rent-stabilized checker or request the rent history from HCR.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 0

No HPD violations on record

DOB building violations · 4

  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Oct 4, 2023

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Mar 2, 2022

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Jun 22, 2020

    Vp*-violation unserved ecb- dismissed
  • Immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Imegncy-immediate emergency anythingoptional

    May 12, 1992

    Dob violation - dismissed

ECB violations · 37

  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection of a 5-story new building closed jobsite, i observed snow/ ice had accumulated on the sidewalk at exposure #1 and 2 and was not removed and maintained, causing tripping and falling hazards

    Jan 28, 2026 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At the time of inspection of a 5-story, new building it was observed jobsite closed, fenced and padlock. missing non-frangible acrylic viewing paneling or equivalent material at exp 1 &4. posters advertising, p

    Jul 1, 2025 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At the time of inspection of a proposed 5-story, new building enclosed within a jobsite fence it was observed, project information panel missing along exposures 1&4-(public facing walkway), as well as necessary

    Jul 1, 2025 · Penalty $3,125

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection observed pedestrian protection sidewalk shed in place not maintained. observed the deck of shed not extending the required 5ft extension as required 3307.6.3, missing parapet panels 3307.6

    Mar 3, 2025 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection observed: sidewalk shed in place exposure# 1-2 permit# b00189272-i1-sh. upon review department record it appear sidewalk shed have expired on 04/14/2024, creating an unsafe condition for p

    Oct 31, 2024 · Penalty $3,125

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Responding a complaint observed: sidewalk shed installed at expo# 1. no underside lighting inoperable light bulbs, failure to maintain as per code 3307.6.4.8 become an unsafe and hazardous condition for pedestr

    Oct 31, 2024 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At the time of inspection observed underside of the sidewalk shed was not illuminated as required by code-bc.3307.6.4.8.this creates hazardous conditions for pedestrans as they walk underneath: slipping, tripp

    Jul 11, 2024 · Penalty $2,400

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At the time of inspection i observed a sidewalk shed in place. i searched in dob system and appeared that sidewalk shed permit # b00189272 expired on 04/14/24. such permit shall be active at all the times when

    Jul 11, 2024 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Contractor failed to renew sidewalk shed permit #b00189272, which expired on 04/14/24. this condition is a clear violation & is not in compliance with building code.renew sidewalk shed permit or remove from the

    Apr 24, 2024

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to comply with dot stipulations. at time of inspection, i observed at exposure 2 (congress st) yodocks barriers and construction materials stored on the public roadway. upon research on dot website, no

    May 17, 2023 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
Show 27 more ↓
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection of class1 vio#39506215z issued on 09-12-22. site is closed, unable to verify correction of violating conditions. upon checking buildings department records no certificate of correction on

    Dec 28, 2022 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection for class 1 vio#39506215z issued on 09-12-22 for failure to protect adjoining property during construction. site is closed, unable to verify conditions. upon checking the building departme

    Nov 21, 2022 · Penalty $3,125

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    In response to complain - existing wall of neighboring property leaning toward constr site observed active construction site with newly installed footings at corner of exp 2&3 next to approx. 8ft high existing

    Sep 12, 2022 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Electrical work w/out permit.at the time of inspection of 5 story bldgobserved,electrical work being done on sidewalk shed at exp.#1 & #2.after doing search on bis & dobnow.the research mentioned that no permit

    Dec 8, 2021 · Penalty $1,600

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Pedestrian protection does not meet code specifications.at the time ofinspection of 5 story new bldg observed,at exp.#1 sidewalk shed erected in place & the parapet was unsecured & was not plumbing & the parape

    Dec 8, 2021 · Penalty $2,400

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Posting of lawful signs,information,pictoral representations,business or advertising messages on protection structures. at time of inspection on a 5 sty nb jobsite,i observed a sidewalk shed installled at exp#1

    Nov 16, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Job site fence not maintained. at time of inspection on a 5 sty nb jobsite i observed a construction fence installed at exp#1&4. the construction fence has large advertising signs installed at exp#1&4,the viewi

    Nov 16, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to designate and/or have a construction superintendent presentat site as required.at the time of my inspection i observed victor tarka designated on the application/pw2 with a expired license as of 1/20

    Feb 10, 2020

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc1704.3.4/no tr1 on file prioer to commencement of work.at time of inspection of an active site currently @4th floor level observed cold form steel exterior and interior framing throughout entire structure all

    Sep 30, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Manufacturers specs;at time of inspection observed structural cold form steel framing on exterior walls and interior floor joists system,after asking construction super vitor tarko for manufacturers specs for e

    Sep 30, 2019 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3309.10 no roof protection. observed at exp.3 block wall built above adjacent roof(76 congress st) wall at exp past parapet of adjoining building w/ no protection for parapet or a/c system. no work allowed 1

    Aug 3, 2019 · Penalty $625

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to maintain safety equip measures n.b currently up to 3rd fl level. at time of inspection,no guardrails were observed at 3rd fl level at exp 1&2 creating a hazardous fall condition. at 2nd fl observed s

    Aug 3, 2019 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failed to maintain fence&walkway. observed fence made of particle board w/ wood splintered and w/ holes. condition of fence could cause injury to public walking next to fence. also,not maintaining 5'-0" clearan

    Aug 3, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Ac 28-103.8 no design drawings for platform. observed platform erectedat shaftway for stairs to be installed at later date,when i requested design drawing for platform none was provided or available. no use of

    Aug 3, 2019 · Penalty $625

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    3304.7 failure to maintain adequate means of egress during construction-related activities.-@time of inspection, it was observed that the construction was in final excavation phase into foundation phase with

    Mar 27, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    The respondent filed drawings with the dob under job#320913231 that failed to meet the minimum requirements of bc107.7.1 and the minimum requirements set forth in ac28-101.2-drawing ssoe-s7 noted field establis

    Dec 7, 2016 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Temporary construction equipment w/ expired permit. @ time of insp observed fence erected @ 63 columbia st w/ expired fence permit# 320913231 expired on 10-19-16 as per dob records. rem: renew expired fence per

    Dec 1, 2016

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work w/o a permit work noted: concrete parking lot created on 2 lots w/o approval from this department. a total of 15 vehicles parked on lots with no drainage provided. remedy: obtain a permit if feasible, are

    May 6, 2008 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to carry out permitted in accordance with applicable laws and regulations in that construction activities are being performed other than on weekdays between the hours of 7am and 6pm without a variance.

    Aug 24, 1996

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Noside walk shed.at time of inspection demolition has started on a(5)sty structure.no sidewalk shed is provided.(at this time has collasped to 1st floor-no side walk shed at site)remedy:provide sidewalk shed

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    No side walk shed:at time of inspection demolition has started on a(4)sty structure no side walk shed is provided (at time of inspection bldg has collasped to 1st floor -no side walk shed at site.remedy:provide

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Mechanical demolition without permit on 5-22-92 supervisor.d.zanbodi d.o.b. brooklyn bourgh office witnessed a crane on the job site attempting mechanical demolition .at time of insoection appox.10:30am a crane

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Mechanical demolition without permit.on 5-22-92 supervisor d.zambodi d.o.b. brooklyn bourgh office witnessed a crane on the job site attempting mechanical demolition.at time of inspection appox.10:30am crane wa

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to carry out demolition operation in a safe and proper manner;at time of inspection -a(4)sty building under demolition has collasped.debris has fallen on sidewalk & street on columbia & congress side

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    No safety zone:at the time of inspection a mechanical demolition has occured on 5-22-92 by supervisor d.zanbodi dob brooklyn bough office aswitnessed-no safety zone.remedy:provide safety zone.

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to provide contractor sign.at time of inspection-no contractors sign provided.remedy:provide a contractors sign at all times during construction operation as per building code.

    May 22, 1992 · Penalty $175

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to carry out demolition operation in a safe and proper manner.at time of inspection -a(4)sty building under demolition has collaspeddrbris has fallen on sidewalk and street on columbia & congress side

    — · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve

Complaints

  • Heating

    Heat related

    Nov 8, 2012 · Apt NA

    Close
  • Heating

    Heat related

    Mar 24, 2003 · Apt BLDG

    Close

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Walk-up apartment building (C1)
Year built
2020
Floors
5
Residential units
11
Building area
16,534 ft²
Lot area
4,528 ft²
Zoning
R6A
Community board
306
Council district
39
Block / lot
299 / 8
Assessed value
$1,382,400
Landmark / historic district
No

HPD registration #363165, last renewed Oct 30, 1995.

Questions about 63 Columbia Street

Who owns 63 Columbia Street?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is Sds Colcon Owner, LLC.

Does 63 Columbia Street have violations?

NYC HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

Is 63 Columbia Street rent stabilized?

No rent-stabilized units appear in its 2018–2024 tax bills. Individual apartments can still be regulated, so request the rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal if unsure.

When was 63 Columbia Street built?

City records list 2020 as the year it was built.

How many apartments are in 63 Columbia Street?

It has 11 residential units and 17 units in total.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.