roofy

2505 Bruckner Boulevard

Bronx, NY 10465BBL 2-05293-0001Map

Owner of record: Bruckner Boulevard Owner LLC

2505 Bruckner Boulevard is a warehouse built in 2020 in Bronx, 10465. The owner of record is Bruckner Boulevard Owner LLC. HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

HPD violations
0
DOB violations
9
ECB violations
46
HPD complaints
1

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
No HPD violations

HPD has not cited this building.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

No rent-stabilized units in 2018–2024 tax bills

Some apartments can still be regulated. Use the rent-stabilized checker or request the rent history from HCR.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 0

No HPD violations on record

DOB building violations · 9

  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Sep 15, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Jan 6, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Jan 6, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Fail to certify class 1 none

    Failure to certify correction on immediately hazardous (class 1) ecb violation

    Sep 2, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    May 2, 2017

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Aug 2, 2015

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    May 2, 2015

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    May 1, 2014

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Oct 11, 2013

    Dob violation - dismissed

ECB violations · 46

  • Class - 1

    Permit holder failed to ensure orientation refresher.at time of my inspection of an incident at a 2 story building where a worker got injured.upon reviewing site safety orientation,i noticed that worker ramon p

    Apr 4, 2022

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to safeguard all persons and property affected by construction.at time of inspection of worker using polaris ranger utility transport vehicle (utv) from roof level to 2nd floor parking garage he flipped

    Feb 16, 2022 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to safeguard all persons and property affected by construction.at time of inspection of worker driving polris ranger utility transport vehicle (utv) from roof level going down parking garage he flipped

    Feb 16, 2022

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Mobile crane cn#203/20 cd#4071 was erected and in operation. respondent(user)failed to ensure that h.m.o performed a pre shift inspection; no logs, comply with code; provide inspection logs

    Dec 14, 2021 · Penalty $3,125

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Mobile crane cn#203/20 cd#4071 was in operation but respondent(h.m.o) did not perform his daily inspection.; no logs, comply with code; provide inspection log

    Dec 14, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3313.1 inadequate storage of flammable gas onsite note:at the time of inspection observed a 2 sty about 605,000 sqft.commertial nb under construction at roof level.some workers working on it.also observed fl

    Jun 29, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Bc 3303.3 inadequate watch person onsite.note:at the time of inspection observed a 2 sty about 605,000 sqft commertial nb under constructionat roof level.some workers working on it.also observed only one wath p

    Jun 29, 2021 · Penalty $620

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Uncapped rebars note:atoi observed 2sty about 605,000sq' commercial nbunder const@roof level.some workers working on it.also observed uncapped rebars@1fl level several area creating hazard of implants when pple

    Jun 29, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to notify the department of an accident/incident that resultedin a fatality or an injury.note:a worker was hit on the head and shoulder by a falling wrench from the 2nd floor.the worker was transported

    May 14, 2021 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Inadequate vertical netting.at time of inspection responding to an incident where na worker was injured due to a tool fell off the 3rd floorand hitting in the head.during inspection noted that section of nettin

    Apr 23, 2021 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
Show 36 more ↓
  • Class - 1

    Failure to institute safety measures at job site.at time of inspectionrespond to an incident where a worker was injured due to a tool fell off the 3rd floor and hit him in the head.during inspection noted there

    Apr 23, 2021 · Penalty $10,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Inadequate pre-shift netting logs.a time of inspection responding to an incident where a worker was injured due to a tool fell off the 3rd floor and hit him in the head.during inspection noted that the pre-shif

    Apr 23, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Mobile crane cn# 176/21 cd#4881 was erected and in operation. respondent failed to designate a proper lift director, properly designate a lift director; designate a qualified lift director

    Mar 18, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Mobile crane cn#176/21 cd#4881 was erected and in operation. respondent(lift director) permitted gustavo caceres to perform rigging activities without a rigging certification, perform duties as required; provid

    Mar 18, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    At time of re-inspection of cd 4520 cn 79520, it was discovered that the assembly director appointed by the crane user was unqualified for his duties. the cd8-ad form that was submitted for the crane assembly l

    Mar 16, 2021 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    At time of inspection, it was discovered that crawler crane cd 4520 cn 79520 was on site and was assembled with no assembly director supervision. no crane that requies a certificate of onsite may be assembled w

    Mar 5, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection, crawler crane cd 4520 cn 79520 was on site, assembled, and used in operation without a completed cd8-ad form. this form documents safety inspections required to be performed and must be s

    Mar 5, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection, it was discovered that crawler crane cd 4520 cn 79520 was on site and assembled with no cd8-ad form completed as required. when assembly is required, the cd8-ad form must be completed to

    Mar 5, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    At time of inspection, it was discovered that crawler crane cd 4520 cn 79520 was on site and assembled with no assembly plan present. an assembly plan is required whenever structural crane components are instal

    Mar 5, 2021

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to institute&maintain safety measures @time of insp observed active const site@2fl level.during insp responding to incident where worker was injured during lifting operation when piece of wood hit his h

    Mar 3, 2021 · Penalty $10,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3301.2 uncapped rebars. note:at the time of inspection observed an active job site,concrete pouring work in progress at 2nd fl level. also observed uncapped rebars at various area on 1st fl level at entire j

    Oct 6, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3308.5 vertical safety netting. note:at the time of complaint type inspection observed an active job site,concrete pouring work in progress at 2nd fl level. also observed at 2nd fl level some area have missi

    Oct 6, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Work does not conform w/ approved construction document. note:at the time of inspection observed an active job site,concrete pouring work inprogress at 2nd fl level. also observed as per approved site safety pl

    Oct 6, 2020

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3304.4.4 missing guardrails around excavation. note:at the time of complaint type inspection observed active job site,concrete pouring work in progress at 2nd fl level. also observed excavated about 10'x10'&

    Oct 6, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Inadequate housekeeping. note:at the time of complaint type inspectionobserved an active job site,concrete pouring work in progress at 2nd fl level. also observed inadequate housekeeping entire job site. observ

    Oct 6, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc 3301.2 missing control access zones(caz). note:at the time of complaint type inspection observed an active job site,concrete pouring workin progress at 2nd fl level. also observed 2 cranes,concrete pump truc

    Oct 6, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Failure to institute and maintain safety equipment measures and temporary construction.note:at the time of inspection responding to complaint of a flip excavator worker got injured taken to the hospital.inspect

    Jun 29, 2020 · Penalty $10,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Bc330181-use and tampering prohibited.note:at the time of incident/accident type complaint inspection as per ssm(site safety management)exacavator operator richard d ricciardi caring one full bucket concrete to

    Jun 29, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Pre-shift safety meeting content.note:at the time of inpsection responding to complaint of a flip excavator worker go injure taken to hospital.inspection revale that excavator was being used for concrete pourin

    Jun 29, 2020 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Manufacutrer specifications.note:at the time of my inspection responding to complaint of a flip excavator worker got injure taken to hospital.inspection revale that excavator was being used for concrete pouring

    Jun 29, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Uncapped rebars.note:at the time of my inspection responding to complaint of a flip excavator worker got injured taken to hospital.as per ssm(site safety manager)fire department,ambulance came to site for the i

    Jun 29, 2020 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Operation of crane without a certificate of approval file drive cn#w10619 cd#3748 was erected on site at 2505 bruckner blvd with an expured cd was expisred on 12-18-291obtain certificate of approval

    Jan 3, 2020

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Respondent failed to make proper notification for mobile crane after may 1,2018.mobile crane cn#1019/19 co#3921 was erected and in operationat 2505 bruckner blvd.but upon request respondent was unable to produc

    Dec 4, 2019 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Respondant failed to have a qualified/competent lift director on site as required.mobile crane cn# 1019/19 co#3421 was erected and in operation by the designated lift director had no lift directors logs neither

    Dec 4, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Lift director failed to perform duties as required.mobile crane cn#101919 co#3921 was being used by respondent but upon request no lift director logs were produced by anyone on site.remedy:perform duties to com

    Dec 4, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Lift director fialed to perform duties as required.mobile crane cn#1019/19 co#3921 was erected and in operatoin but lift director george rittman was unable to provide any logs.though the crane has been in opera

    Dec 4, 2019

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.sign on display w/o permit.(future home of paragon nyc)#2

    Feb 1, 2018 · Penalty $1,200

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.failure to have licensed sign hanger attach or erect sign.(future home of paragon #2)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.sign prohibited w/in 200 ft and w/in view of an arterial highway-cross bronx expwy(future home of paragon nyc#1)rem:remove illegal sign.

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com sign prohibited w/in 200 ft and w/in view of an arterial highway(hutchinson river expwy)(future home of paragon nyc#3)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.failure to have licensed sign hanger attach or erect sign.(future home of paragon nyc#3)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising co sign on display w/o permit.(future home of paragon nyc#1)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018 · Penalty $1,200

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising co.sign on display w/o permit.(future home of paragon nyc #3)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018 · Penalty $1,200

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.failure to have licensed sign hanger attach or erect sign.,(future home of paragon nyc #1)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising co.sign prohibited w/in 200 ft and w/in view of anarterial highway-cross bronx expwy.(future home of paragon nyc#2)rem:remove illegal sign

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Outdoor advertising com.failure to obtain oac reg# wh8ile engaging in the outdoor advertising business.(future home of paragon nyc sign#1,2 and 3 rem:remove illegal signs/register

    Feb 1, 2018

    Resolve

Complaints

  • Plumbing

    Water supply

    Sep 12, 2025 · Apt BLDG

    Close

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Warehouse (E9)
Year built
2020
Floors
2
Residential units
—
Building area
735,520 ft²
Lot area
835,657 ft²
Zoning
C8-1
Community board
210
Council district
13
Block / lot
5293 / 1
Assessed value
$57,643,000
Landmark / historic district
No

Questions about 2505 Bruckner Boulevard

Who owns 2505 Bruckner Boulevard?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is Bruckner Boulevard Owner LLC.

Does 2505 Bruckner Boulevard have violations?

NYC HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

Is 2505 Bruckner Boulevard rent stabilized?

No rent-stabilized units appear in its 2018–2024 tax bills. Individual apartments can still be regulated, so request the rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal if unsure.

When was 2505 Bruckner Boulevard built?

City records list 2020 as the year it was built.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.