roofy

37-03 101 Street

Queens, NY 11368BBL 4-01767-0001Map

Owner of record: Liang Qin Song

37-03 101 Street is a mixed residential and retail building built in 2005 in Queens, 11368. It has 3 residential units across 3 floors. The owner of record is Liang Qin Song. HPD has recorded 4 housing violations here, most recently on March 9, 2022. City tax records listed 3 rent-stabilized apartments here in 2019.

HPD violations
4
DOB violations
22
ECB violations
35
HPD complaints
4

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
Last violation Mar 9, 2022

Date of the most recent HPD inspection that found a problem.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

Rent-stabilized units in 2019
3
About 100% of the building's 3 apartments

Counts come from owners' rent-stabilization filings shown on NYC Department of Finance tax bills, as extracted by JustFix. They tell you a building has stabilized apartments, not which ones.

Stabilized units by tax-bill year

Think your apartment is stabilized? Request its rent history from HCR (free), then check your renewal with the renewal calculator.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 4

  • A

    File annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.

    Mar 9, 2022

    Closed — Violation dismissed
  • A

    File annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.

    Apr 19, 2021

    Closed — Violation dismissed
  • I

    And is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.

    Apr 19, 2021

    Closed — Violation dismissed
  • I

    And is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.

    Oct 19, 2015

    Closed — Violation dismissed

DOB building violations · 22

  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Dec 23, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Dec 23, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
Show 12 more ↓
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 5, 2003

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Imegncy-immediate emergency anythingoptional

    May 23, 2001

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Feb 7, 2000

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Mar 16, 1999

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    May 4, 1998

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Sep 16, 1997

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Feb 10, 1997

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Aug 29, 1995

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boiler boiler optional

    B-boiler boiler optional

    May 12, 1992

    Vp*-violation unserved ecb- dismissed

ECB violations · 35

  • Class - 3

    Natco boiler 400,000btu with h stamp is unregistered with dob, maintain boiler; correct violation+submit certificate of correction

    Nov 20, 2025 · Penalty $500

    Active
  • Hazardous

    Work does not conform to approved plan (ammended plan approved by dob on 8/17/04)sheet # a-1 a-2 alteration of existing building in progressunder nb permit plan shows new concrete foundation walls where as con

    Aug 26, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to provide approved plan at site at the time of inspection.alteration of existing bldg with more additional floor in progress and no approved plan is available at site for the inspection.remedy:stop all

    Aug 13, 2004 · Penalty $130

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Work w/out a permit.alteration.on inspection of premises alteration of existing bldg with additional floor is in progress.dob records show no alteration permit has been obtained by contractors/developer.(inter

    Aug 13, 2004 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to carry out demolition operation in a safe and proper manner. upon inspection at the above property interior demolition was in progress debris transported to container at street from top of side walk

    May 25, 2004 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    No contractor sign. upon inspection at the above property. demolition was in progress removed interior walls and windows and there is no contractor sign posted. remedy: post contractor sign as per code.

    May 25, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Work without a permit. upon inspection at the above property interior demolition was in progress removed interior walls side walk shed was erected at 101 st approx 60 feet with 2x6 post braced with 1"x 2" ties

    May 25, 2004 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Expired permit. upon inspection at the above property demo permit #401623463 expired 1/1/04 dept. record show no new permit issued. stop all work make area safe. remedy: renew permit as per code.

    May 25, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to weather proof adjacent building.on inspection of above premises the building was demolished almost 5 (five) months back,but the party wall of adjacent building 101-02,37 ave (laundary rm)was not weat

    May 24, 2004 · Penalty $1,250

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Job site fence defective.plywood fence at perimeter has gaps,openings and inadequate support due to debris stacked on fence.fence in danger of collapse onto sidewalk.remedy:maintain fence.

    Apr 28, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
Show 25 more ↓
  • Hazardous

    Fail to provide adequate housekeeping on inspection of above premises, approx - 60 w yd of construction waste material spreaded all over site and contractor failed to provide adequate housekeeping at constructi

    Apr 13, 2004 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    No guard rails. on inspection of above premises, building was up to roof, interior framing was in progress there were unguarded opening on floors walls and at ground, which is hazardous to workers remedy : prov

    Apr 13, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to post contractor's sign. new building were upto roof interior works in progress no contractor signs were posted at site remedy : post contractor sign at site

    Apr 13, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Fail to provide adequate housekeeping. on inspection of above premisesapprox 50 w yd of construction waste materials spreaded all over site and contractor failed to provide adequate house keeping at constructio

    Apr 13, 2004 · Penalty $350

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to post dot permit d.o.t permit to placed cinder blocks on thesidewalk and structural steel beam on the street in first in front of 37-05 101 st was not posted on site.remedy:post d.o.t permit.

    Feb 2, 2004 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to post contractor's sign att ime of insp of the above premises brick wall was up to 2nd flr level and contractor's sign was not posted on site.post contractor's sign.

    Feb 2, 2004 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to comply with stop work order #110703c03r201 work noted: erected 3 additional foundation for biulding and instal metal decking. remedy: comply with stop work order

    Dec 4, 2003 · Penalty $1,500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to protect adjoining structures excavation operations: noted excavated shear cut approx 10ft. deep undermining stone rubble foundation of 101-02 37 ave. remedy: stop all work immediately except to provi

    Dec 4, 2003 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Job site fence defective on inspection of above premises 8' deep openfoundation and 8' - 10' deep excavation was at site jobsite fence on 102 st was fallen down on sidewalk for approx : 24' long and site is ea

    Nov 13, 2003 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide protection at sides of excavation. noted: shear cutexcavation for foundation walls approx 8'to 10'deep without providing sheeting, shoring & bracing. remedy: stop all work immediately except

    Nov 7, 2003 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide 8 foot high fence where required during excavation operations. noted: 40 feet of fence is open leaving excavation approx.8 ft. to 10 ft. deep making it a danger to public safety. remedy: stop

    Nov 7, 2003 · Penalty $480

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide protection at sides of excavation. on inspection of above premises 10'-12' deep excavation was done for new building foundation. there were no adequate protection to sides of excavation such

    Nov 6, 2003 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to safeguard public and property affected by construction operation. on inspection of above premises 10'-12' deep excavation and foundation work in progress there were no proper fencing or safeguard at

    Nov 6, 2003 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide protection at sides of excavation. on inspection of above premises, 10'-12' deep excavation was done and foundation was in progress. there were no adequate protection to the sides of excavati

    Nov 6, 2003 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide protection at sides of excvation on inspection of above premises 10'-12' deep excavation was in progress for new buildingfoundation.there were no protection to the sides of excavation such as

    Oct 28, 2003 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to remove glass at time of inspection bldg was down to 1st (exterior walls partially remaining) however glass had not been removed prior to start, large glass pieces & glass skylight had been mixed in w

    Oct 2, 2003 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Sidewalk does not meet bldg code specifications: (a) no lights, at time of inspection lite bulbs to illuminate sidewalk under sidewalk bridge missing & in following electrical line for lites to it's source foun

    Oct 2, 2003 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Side-walk shed does not meet building code specifications.noted:light duty contruction less than 4(four feet)wide with no leteral cross bracing and no side or top enclosure panels for approx 20' liner feet.reme

    Jul 23, 2003 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to carry out demolition operations in a safe and proper mannernoted:at west elevation steel lintel removed from load bearing opeing in wall.also @ west elevation approx 15' of unsupported masonary.insuf

    Jul 23, 2003 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Side walk shed not to specification on inspection of above premises bulding of 30' & in high standing on side walk @ 37th ave was under demolition temporary sidewalk shed was errected on 37 ave & 102 st which d

    Jul 3, 2003 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Sidewalk shed not built according to building ocde. work noted single shed of plywood deck mailed t o4'x4'x8' post does not meet required standard 300 psf or 150 psf. live load, no braking provide to prevent di

    May 5, 2003 · Penalty $2,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    No dot permit posted on inspection of above premises 8' high plywood fencing was erected on sidewalk for the protection of demo : site however no d.o.t permit was posted at site to clsoe sidewalk ( sidewalk was

    May 1, 2003 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to maintain exterior building wall.defect is:loose and buldging bricks of parapet wall at north west corner of building in danger offalling.remedy:erect sidewalk shed.make safe immediately,obtain necess

    May 22, 2001 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to maintain exterior building wall: on south side wall 40' from 101 street seperating wall and cracked from ground to roof approximate 2" to 3" wide. on top parapet wall almost ready to collapse and dan

    Mar 10, 1998

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    10a, boiler leaking on left bottom rear corner underneathe the jacket.the leak be thoroughly investigated and inspector be informed of result and repairs if necessary.

    May 12, 1992 · Penalty $85

    Resolve

Complaints

  • Unsanitary condition

    Mold

    Apr 22, 2022 · Apt 2

    Close
  • Plumbing

    Bathtub/shower

    Apr 22, 2022 · Apt 2

    Close
  • Plumbing

    Toilet

    Apr 22, 2022 · Apt 2

    Close
  • Paint/plaster

    Wall

    Apr 22, 2022 · Apt 2

    Close

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Mixed residential and retail building (S3)
Year built
2005
Floors
3
Residential units
3
Building area
2,970 ft²
Lot area
991 ft²
Zoning
R6B
Community board
403
Council district
21
Block / lot
1767 / 1
Assessed value
$451,350
Landmark / historic district
No

HPD registration #427055, last renewed Jul 29, 2025.

Questions about 37-03 101 Street

Who owns 37-03 101 Street?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is Liang Qin Song.

Does 37-03 101 Street have violations?

Yes. NYC HPD has recorded 4 housing violations at this property.

Is 37-03 101 Street rent stabilized?

NYC Department of Finance tax bills listed 3 rent-stabilized units here in 2019 (about 100% of its 3 apartments). To confirm a specific apartment, request its rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal.

When was 37-03 101 Street built?

City records list 2005 as the year it was built.

How many apartments are in 37-03 101 Street?

It has 3 residential units and 4 units in total.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.