roofy

159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way

Queens, NY 11433BBL 4-10127-0001Map

Owner of record: NYC Housing Authority

159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way is an elevator apartment building built in 1960 in Queens, 11433. It has 146 residential units across 3 floors. The owner of record is NYC Housing Authority. HPD has recorded 6 housing violations here, most recently on February 6, 2002. 6 of the 6 most recent violations are still open.

HPD violations
6
DOB violations
22
ECB violations
18
HPD complaints
0

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
Last violation Feb 6, 2002

Date of the most recent HPD inspection that found a problem.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

No rent-stabilized units in 2018–2024 tax bills

Some apartments can still be regulated. Use the rent-stabilized checker or request the rent history from HCR.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 6

  • A

    Paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department walls and ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out
  • B

    Replace with new the missing shower rod(building 106-140) in the bathroom located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out
  • B

    Replace with new the missing floor tiles in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out
  • A

    Refit closet doors in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out
  • A

    Paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department walls and ceiling in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out
  • B

    Properly repair the broken or defective locking device in the entrance located at apt 3c, 3rd story

    Feb 6, 2002 · Apt 3C

    Open — Nov sent out

DOB building violations · 22

  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 - multiple years (2023)

    Jun 23, 2024

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 - multiple years (2022)

    Apr 22, 2023

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 - multiple years (2021)

    Aug 21, 2022

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 - multiple years (2020)

    Jun 20, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 - multiple years (2019)

    Jun 29, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to submit eer none

    Failure to submit an eer per ad. code sec. 28-308.4 in 2017

    Mar 27, 2018

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • No report and / or late filing (facade) facade required

    Failed to file fisp cycle 7b technical report by 08/21/2012

    Aug 30, 2013

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • No report and / or late filing (facade) facade required

    Failed to file fisp cycle 7b technical report by 08/21/2012

    Aug 30, 2013

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade optional

    Failure to maintain a/cs. on 5/5/13, an unsafe notices fisp3 document was submitted to flsp/dob unit by anthony stasio, p.e. stating building tenants had installed window-mounted a/cs in a non-compliant manner. the a/cs are to be installed per manufacturers instruction an building owner requirements. dob control number 275014

    May 23, 2013

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade optional

    Failure to maintain a/cs. on 5/5/13, an unsafe notices fisp3 document was submitted to flsp/dob unit by anthony stasio, p.e. stating building tenants had installed window-mounted a/cs in a non-compliant manner. the a/cs are to be installed per manufacturers instruction an building owner requirements. dob control number 275014

    May 23, 2013

    Dob violation - dismissed
Show 12 more ↓
  • Facade facade optional

    Ll11/98-local law 11/98 - facade facade optional

    May 14, 2009

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade optional

    Ll11/98-local law 11/98 - facade facade optional

    Oct 9, 2008

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade optional

    Ll1198-local law 11/98 - facade facade optional

    Nov 30, 2007

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade optional

    Ll1198-local law 11/98 - facade facade optional

    Nov 30, 2007

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade required

    L1198-local law 11/98 - facade facade required

    Aug 8, 2002

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Facade facade required

    L1198-local law 11/98 - facade facade required

    Aug 8, 2002

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatoroptional

    1

    Apr 7, 1992

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatoroptional

    1

    Apr 7, 1992

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    (18)2nd floor

    Mar 20, 1990

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    (18) 1st floor (74) replace broken counterweight shackle springs (75) repair floor in car

    Aug 2, 1989

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    (74)restore car to service for the purpose of inspection

    Aug 2, 1989

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    34)file a bn for newly installed car door and perforn necessary

    Feb 10, 1989

    Dob violation - resolved

ECB violations · 18

  • Class - 2

    Failure to maintain exterior bldg walls&appurtenances.as noted:atoi i observed on exp1 object sitting on 6fl windowsill ac inadequately supported on 2fl.exp3 ac inadequately supported on 2fl over walkway to bsm

    Aug 18, 2021 · Penalty $1,250

    Active
  • Class - 2

    Failure to maintain building in a code- compliant manner. at the time of inspection, at rear of premises exposure 3, a section of 8' high chain link fence is cut, not secured, and has an opening allowing for un

    Aug 21, 2020

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Sec. 3314.4.2 maintenance & repair. all scaffolds shall be maintained in a safe condition. note: sidewalk shed has been erected at exp #1 (160 st) under permit #420322724 rrespondent failed to keep the sws in

    Feb 20, 2014 · Penalty $4,000

    Active
  • Class - 1

    Unlawfully continued work while on notice of a swo. note: swo was issued at 5.16.13 violation #34990081h. respondent failed to apply for re-inspection as required by code specification.equipment has beenremoved

    Jan 16, 2014 · Penalty $24,000

    Active
  • Class - 2

    No notification. noted: at time of inspection 2 suspended scaffolds were hanging from outrigger beams on exp 3. contractor failed to notify the dob's prior to use/installation of outrigger w/i connection to

    May 16, 2013 · Penalty $4,000

    Active
  • Class - 2

    Work w/o a permit: expd permit - noted: shed erected under permit #420103104 has expd on 5.4.13, and no renewal has been submitted to the dept. remedy: renew permit.

    May 8, 2013

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended 6th round report acceptable to this dept indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial ll11/98 report.36010094n.rem:file an amended report following remedial repairs

    Dec 17, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended 6th round report acceptable to this dept indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial ll11/98report.36010095p.rem:file an amended report following remedial repairs

    Dec 17, 2010 · Penalty $8,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Sidewalk shed does not meet code specifications.noted:lights installedon shed not illuminated after dark. remedy:maintain shed as per code.

    Nov 7, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended sixth round report acceptable to this dept indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial local law 11/98 report remedy:file an amended report following repairs of th

    Oct 23, 2009

    Resolve
Show 8 more ↓
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended sixth round report acceptable to this dept indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial local law 11/98 report remedy:file an amended report following repairs of th

    Oct 23, 2009

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended 6th rd report acceptable to this dept indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial local law 11/98 report. remedy: file an amended report following remedial repairs

    May 28, 2009

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an acceptable 6th round technical report in compliancewith code provisions:periodic inspection of exterior walls & appurtenances as required by article 28.302 & dob rules & regulations.remedy:

    Apr 24, 2009

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Local law 6th cycle report filed as unsafe by architect engineer no amended report was filed unsafe conditions reuire safety provisions for the public as per 27-129 1 rcny 32-03 (b) (5) (i) no sidewalk shed fen

    Feb 23, 2009

    Resolve
  • Class - 2

    Failure to file an amended sixth round report acceptable to this dept.indicating correction of unsafe conditions described in initial local law 11/98 report remedy:file an amended report following remedial repa

    Dec 5, 2008

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    74i,(74)replace broken countweight shackle springs.

    Oct 16, 1991

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    35p,74i,74 counterweight shackle springs.

    Nov 27, 1990

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    18l11,73x#. (18) 2nd floor. (73) restore to service for the purpose ofinspection.

    Nov 21, 1990 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve

Complaints

No HPD complaints in our records

Complaint data is still being backfilled from NYC Open Data.

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Elevator apartment building (D3)
Year built
1960
Floors
3
Residential units
146
Building area
177,000 ft²
Lot area
117,720 ft²
Zoning
R5
Community board
412
Council district
28
Block / lot
10127 / 1
Assessed value
$7,640,550
Landmark / historic district
No

Questions about 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way

Who owns 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is NYC Housing Authority.

Does 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way have violations?

Yes. NYC HPD has recorded 6 housing violations at this property.

Is 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way rent stabilized?

No rent-stabilized units appear in its 2018–2024 tax bills. Individual apartments can still be regulated, so request the rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal if unsure.

When was 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way built?

City records list 1960 as the year it was built.

How many apartments are in 159-02 Tuskegee Airmen Way?

It has 146 residential units.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.