roofy

104-02 Roosevelt Avenue

Queens, NY 11368BBL 4-01984-0088Map

Owner of record: La Casa Blanca INC

104-02 Roosevelt Avenue is a store building built in 1999 in Queens, 11368. The owner of record is La Casa Blanca INC. HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

HPD violations
0
DOB violations
12
ECB violations
37
HPD complaints
0

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
No HPD violations

HPD has not cited this building.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

No rent-stabilized units in 2018–2024 tax bills

Some apartments can still be regulated. Use the rent-stabilized checker or request the rent history from HCR.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 0

No HPD violations on record

DOB building violations · 12

  • Elevator affirmation of correction elevatorrequired

    Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2016 cat 1 insp/tst

    Jan 26, 2018

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Residential elevator periodic inspection/test elevatorrequired

    Failure to perform category 5 inspection

    Jun 1, 2016

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator annual inspection / test elevatorrequired

    Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2014 inspection/test

    Jun 10, 2015

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Jun 3, 2015

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator annual inspection / test elevatorrequired

    Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2012 inspection/test

    Mar 31, 2014

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Dec 27, 2013

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Nov 13, 2012

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Oct 13, 2011

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Jan 9, 2008

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Mar 16, 1999

    Dob violation - dismissed
Show 2 more ↓
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Aug 29, 1995

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Boilers boiler required

    Ll6291-local law 62/91 - boilers boiler required

    Jun 28, 1993

    Dob violation - dismissed

ECB violations · 37

  • Class - 2

    Illegal use in commercial dist in c1-4 commercial zoning dist unlic phys treatment prohibit use per zr12-10 op as "zoylita's enterprises" spa&beauty on 1fl,individual not lic by nys as healthcare prof or under

    May 25, 2022 · Penalty $625

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Work w/o permit.work noted:@1fl erected full ht partitions to create 4massage rms,installed lights&outlets obtain permits.

    May 25, 2022 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to that allowed by the certificate of occupancy or building department records.occupancy noted:cellar level to be occupied for office use,now being used as a dvd retail store.

    Jun 26, 2006 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to dob records dob records cofo# 400968841 indicates premises to be (1) office at cellar, (5) retail stores @ 1st flr & (1) office at 2nd flr.

    May 10, 2006 · Penalty $2,500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Altered building occupied without a valid certificate of occupancy alttype , job#401612091 medical office at 2nd fl now in use at 2nd fl jo b not signed off at time of inspection remedy:obtain a valid cofo prio

    Aug 25, 2005 · Penalty $350

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work does not confrom to approved plans and application no conforming work noted job#400968841 indicates cellar to be occupancy group 6e(office) at time of inspection used as group 6c (store) remedy:conform to

    Aug 25, 2005 · Penalty $250

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to that allowed by the certificate of occupancy of building department records cofo # 94990 indicates second floor use for show room. illegal occupancy noted:at second floor now being used by

    Aug 20, 2005

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having installed an awning w/o a permit. (2) having installed a sign w/o a pemrit

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having installed an awning w/o a permit. remedy: remove illegal work.

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having installedan awning w/o a permit. remedy: remove illegal work.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
Show 27 more ↓
  • Non-hazardous

    Having illuminated awning signage with a surface area exceeding 12 sq ft. not limited to the name and address of the establishment. remedy; remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having installed an awning w/o a permit. remedy remove illegal work

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) haivng illuminated awning signage. (2) not limited to the name and address of the establishment remedy : remove illegal signage

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having an illuminated sign larger than 8 sq ft. in a window in a c district. remedy: remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having installed a sign's w/o a permit (2) having an illuminated sign w/o a curren permit. remedy : remove illegal work

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having installed an awning w/o a permit. (2) having installed a sign w/o a pemrit (3) having an illuminated sign w/o a current permit.

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having illuminated awninb signage (2) not limited to the name and address of the establishment,

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having illuminated awning signage with a surface area exceed 12 sq ft. not limited to the name and address of the establishment. remedy: remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    (1) having installed a sign's w/o a permit. remedy : remove illega work

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having installedan awning w/o a permit. having installed signs w/o a permit. remedy: remove illegal work.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having illuminated awning signage with a surface area exceeding 12 sq feet. not limited to the name and address of the establishment. remedy: remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having an illuminated sign larger than 8 sq ft in a window in a c district. remedy: remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having installed an awning w/o a permt. remedy: remove illegal work.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having illuminated awning signage with a surface area exceeding 12 sq ft. not limited to the name and address of the establishment. remedy: remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having an illuminated sign larger than 8 sq feet in a window in a c district. remedy; remove illegal signage.

    May 14, 2002

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Having installed an awning without a permit remedy remove illegal work

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    1.having illumination awning signage with with a surface area exceeding 12sq ft 2)with letters higher than 12"3)not limited to the name and address of the establishment remedy remove illegal signage

    May 14, 2002 · Penalty $400

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide 8 foot fence where required during construction operations. sections of 8 foot fence missing at sides and front facing roosevelt ave. construction debris, wood, paper all around site. prov

    Dec 27, 1999 · Penalty $480

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to provide approved plans at premises at time of inspection. stop all wor. provide approved plans.

    Dec 27, 1999 · Penalty $130

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to dept of building records, from a legal 2 family to illegal 2 family with illegal stores and offices illegal occupancy noted at attic level g & g services with 5 rooms (office) no access to

    May 16, 1998 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Work without a permit. illegal work noted at attic level partitions erected creating office space (5 rooms) illegal work noted at 2nd flr level; mens room and ladies room added on for retail store use. ( no

    May 16, 1998 · Penalty $800

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work without a permit work noted made an extension on front and west side of house approx.32x50x10h for retail stores.remedy obtain a permit if feasible or restore premises to prior legal condition.

    Dec 17, 1997 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work without a permit. work noted: made an extention on front and westside of house approx: 32'*50'*10' high for retail stores. remedy: obtain a permit if feasible or restore premises to prior legal condition

    May 16, 1994 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to that allowed by the building department records from: a legal dwelling to: illegal retail stores, offices and dwellingremedy: discontinue illegal use

    May 16, 1994 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Occupancy contrary to that allowed by the building departments recordsfrom a legal dwelling to illegal retail stores offices & dwellilng remedy discontinue illegal use

    Feb 1, 1993 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work without a permit noted made an extension on front and west side of house approx 32'x50'x10' high for retail stores remedy a permit if feasible or restore premises to prior legal condition

    Feb 1, 1993 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work without a permit extension on corner for retail stores approx. 32'x50'x10' high, occupancy contrary to bldg dept records dwelling changed to retail stores offices x dwelling. remedy: obtain permit, discon

    Apr 19, 1990 · Penalty $570

    Resolve

Complaints

No HPD complaints in our records

Complaint data is still being backfilled from NYC Open Data.

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Store building (K2)
Year built
1999
Floors
2
Residential units
—
Building area
6,400 ft²
Lot area
3,596 ft²
Zoning
R6B
Community board
404
Council district
21
Block / lot
1984 / 88
Assessed value
$969,300
Landmark / historic district
No

Questions about 104-02 Roosevelt Avenue

Who owns 104-02 Roosevelt Avenue?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is La Casa Blanca INC.

Does 104-02 Roosevelt Avenue have violations?

NYC HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

Is 104-02 Roosevelt Avenue rent stabilized?

No rent-stabilized units appear in its 2018–2024 tax bills. Individual apartments can still be regulated, so request the rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal if unsure.

When was 104-02 Roosevelt Avenue built?

City records list 1999 as the year it was built.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.