roofy

72-06 Northern Boulevard

Queens, NY 11372BBL 4-01245-0001Map

Owner of record: 72-02 Northern Blvd.realty Corp

72-06 Northern Boulevard is an office building built in 2005 in Queens, 11372. The owner of record is 72-02 Northern Blvd.realty Corp. HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

HPD violations
0
DOB violations
25
ECB violations
34
HPD complaints
0

What to know

Good
No open Class C

No open immediately-hazardous violations among recent records.

Good
No HPD violations

HPD has not cited this building.

Good
No unpaid ECB fines

No balance due on recent ECB violations.

Rent stabilization

No rent-stabilized units in 2018–2024 tax bills

Some apartments can still be regulated. Use the rent-stabilized checker or request the rent history from HCR.

Violations

Most recent first. Showing up to 50 per agency.

HPD housing violations · 0

No HPD violations on record

DOB building violations · 25

  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Aug 2, 2022

    Dob violation - active
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Jun 1, 2022

    Dob violation - active
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Feb 2, 2022

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to post energy grade/score none

    Failure to display energy efficiency score and energy efficiency grade as per adcode sec. 28-309.12.3

    Dec 1, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Nov 2, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Aug 2, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Jun 2, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to post energy grade/score none

    Failure to display energy efficiency score and energy efficiency grade as per adcode sec. 28-309.12.3

    Apr 29, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Feb 2, 2021

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Nov 2, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
Show 15 more ↓
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Aug 2, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    May 2, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Feb 2, 2020

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Nov 2, 2019

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    Aug 2, 2019

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Failure to benchmark none

    Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

    May 2, 2019

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator affirmation of correction elevatorrequired

    Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2016 cat 1 insp/tst

    Jan 26, 2018

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator affirmation of correction elevatorrequired

    Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2015 cat 1 insp/tst

    Jan 3, 2017

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator affirmation of correction elevatorrequired

    Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2014 cat 1 insp/tst

    Nov 14, 2016

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Elevator elevatorrequired

    E-elevator elevatorrequired

    Apr 7, 2015

    Dob violation - resolved
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    Nov 15, 2006

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Amended

    Dec 13, 2000

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Construction other optional

    C-construction other optional

    May 23, 2000

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Imegncy-immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Feb 28, 2000

    Dob violation - dismissed
  • Immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Imegncy-immediate emergency anythingoptional

    Dec 15, 1999

    Dob violation - dismissed

ECB violations · 34

  • Class - 2

    Failure to maintain bldg in code complaint manner. observed at 9:18am @ front of bldg fdny conn. missing hose caps. remedy : repair or replace

    Oct 25, 2014 · Penalty $100

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Property owner acting as oac failure to obtain oac registration numberwhile engaging in the outdoor ad business. (heineken) remedy: remove illegal signs/register.

    Jun 4, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign exceeds max surface area in c2-2 district of 150 sq ft. sign approx 10' x 30' = 300 sq ft. (heineken) bottom r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign exceeds max surface area in c2-2 district of 150 sq ft. sign approx 10' x 20' = 200 sq ft. (heineken) bottom l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign exceeded max surface area in c2-2 district of 150 sq ft sign approx 10' x 30' = 300 sq ft. (heineken) top r. remedy: remove illegalsign.

    Jun 4, 2010

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) bottom r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) bottom l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) top r. remedy: removeillegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) top m/r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) top m/l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
Show 24 more ↓
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign prohibited in c2-2 district. (heineken) top l. remedy: removeillegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) bottom r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) bottom l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) top r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) top m/r. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) top m/l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Class - 1

    Oac sign on display w/o a permit. (heineken) top l. remedy: remove illegal sign.

    Jun 4, 2010 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work does not conform to approv. plans noted:work under appl. #400816818 shows erection of three (3)more steel columns than whats indicated on approved plans. remedy:conform to approved plans or amend drawings

    Jun 1, 2006 · Penalty $250

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to provide approved plans at premises at time of inspection.defects pouring of concrete foundation at west. remedy: stop work provide approved plans for inspection.

    Mar 7, 2005 · Penalty $130

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to protect adjoining structures during excavation operations.premises 33-17 72nd street north side of property undermined by excavation operations at n.b. #400816818.concrete patio cracked & seperating

    Jan 5, 2005 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to provide protection at sides of excavation.noted:no sheeting,shoring,or bracing provided at south side of excavation causing undermining of adjacent bldg at 33-17 72 street causing cracks in patio app

    Jan 5, 2005 · Penalty $5,000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Abanconed and discontinued operations: abandoned and discontinued construction operations site 8' foot fence missing at adjoinign property driveway approximate 20' long. construction stop after excavation more

    May 17, 2002

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    1 routine con insp i found the excavated site 10" relow the curb level with app 18" of stagnant water remedy restore stagnant water

    Jun 25, 2001

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Job site fence defective.upon inspection of above site.approx 30'long fence on 72 street was fallen down and the excavated site was accessable to public.remedy:repair or replace the fence.

    Feb 15, 2001

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work without a permit:expired permit:upon insepction of above address.permit #400816818 was expired in march 2000 and dob records show that the permit was not renewed.site was excavated up to 8' (approx) deep a

    Feb 15, 2001

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to drain excavation site.upon inspection of above site excavation pit approx 8" deep with approx-2'water.aprox:90'x90' area.(ny city orange trash basket dipped in water shows approx:2' water in the pit.

    Feb 15, 2001

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to maintain defect is sections of construction fence collapsed into excavated trench. remedy: make safe immediately maintain fence.

    Dec 12, 2000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to maintain noted:approx 2 to 3 ft of standing water noted at excavation site water covers most of area aprrox 100'lx100'w remedy:pump water immediately

    Jun 14, 2000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to maintain : noted: approx 1 foot of water covering approx 805 of 100'x100' excavation site. dept of excavation site approx 10' deep. remedy; pump water immediately

    May 23, 2000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to maintain. defect is: construction fence at front of premis-es on northern blvd has collapsed. collapsed section is approximately 40 feet long. remedy: repair fence immediately.

    Apr 10, 2000

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Work with an expired permit. (fence) permit #400816818 posted at site.no new permit posted. permit expired on 12-31-99. remedy: obtain/renewpermit for construction fence.

    Feb 7, 2000 · Penalty $500

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to safeguard public and property affected by constrruction operations: defect is: sinking of sidewalk and ground of adjacent properties. remedy: safeguard public property

    Dec 13, 1999 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve
  • Hazardous

    Failure to file tri prior to start of controlled work. remedy: file form tr1

    Dec 13, 1999 · Penalty $350

    Resolve
  • Non-hazardous

    Failure to protect adjoining structures during excavation operations .remedy: stop all work make site safe submit engineers report on structurral stability

    Dec 13, 1999 · Penalty $1,000

    Resolve

Complaints

No HPD complaints in our records

Complaint data is still being backfilled from NYC Open Data.

Sales history

No recorded sales in our data

Sales come from the NYC Department of Finance rolling sales file.

Building details

Building type
Office building (O7)
Year built
2005
Floors
2
Residential units
—
Building area
35,970 ft²
Lot area
10,000 ft²
Zoning
R5
Community board
403
Council district
25
Block / lot
1245 / 1
Assessed value
$3,642,300
Landmark / historic district
No

Questions about 72-06 Northern Boulevard

Who owns 72-06 Northern Boulevard?

The owner of record in NYC Department of City Planning PLUTO data is 72-02 Northern Blvd.realty Corp.

Does 72-06 Northern Boulevard have violations?

NYC HPD has no housing violations on record for this property.

Is 72-06 Northern Boulevard rent stabilized?

No rent-stabilized units appear in its 2018–2024 tax bills. Individual apartments can still be regulated, so request the rent history from NYS Homes and Community Renewal if unsure.

When was 72-06 Northern Boulevard built?

City records list 2005 as the year it was built.

Source: NYC Open Data (DCP PLUTO, HPD, DOB, ECB/OATH, DOF). Records can lag the city's systems. Data refreshed weekly.