104 Hudson Street

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Mar 15, 2017

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Mar 15, 2017

Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2014 cat 1 insp/tst

Nov 14, 2016

Vio issued to elevator - fail to correct defects on 2014 cat 1 insp/tst

Nov 14, 2016

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 29, 2016

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 29, 2016

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 29, 2016

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

Aug 2, 2015

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

May 2, 2015

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2013 inspection/test

Oct 31, 2014

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

Jun 6, 2014

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2012 inspection/test

Mar 31, 2014

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2012 inspection/test

Mar 31, 2014

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2012 inspection/test

Mar 31, 2014

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2012 inspection/test

Mar 31, 2014

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Mar 3, 2014

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

Jun 3, 2013

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 20, 2013

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 19, 2013

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 19, 2013

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Feb 19, 2013

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2011 inspection/test

Oct 1, 2012

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Aug 15, 2012

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

May 3, 2012

Ll11/98-local law 11/98 - facade facade optional

Feb 14, 2012

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Jan 6, 2012

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Jan 6, 2012

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Jan 6, 2012

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Jan 6, 2012

Failure to file benchmarking report of energy use as per ad. code sec. 28-309.4

Jan 1, 2012

Violation issued to elevator-failure to file category 1 2010 inspection/test

Dec 13, 2011

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Oct 20, 2010

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Oct 20, 2010

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Oct 20, 2010

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Oct 20, 2010

Vcat1-elevator annual inspection / test elevatorrequired

Oct 8, 2010

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Mar 4, 2010

E-elevator elevatorrequired

Mar 24, 2009

Ll1081-local law 10/81 - elevator elevatoroptional

Feb 27, 2009

P-plumbing none

Oct 30, 2008

Work w.o permit. note: a temporary structure was erected w/pipe scaffold material & is being used as a working deck w.o a permit & designed drawing to depict pounds per sq ft. stop all work on deck. remedy: obt

Dec 2, 2008 · Penalty $1,600

Work w/o a permit failure to provide department of building approved plans. work noted: stand pipe extension at 9-10 flrs. stop all related to stand pipe. remedy: obtain permit & department of building approved

Oct 30, 2008

Failure to safeguard all persons and property affected by constructionoperations. noted: there is missing guardrails and toe boards on supported scaffold apprx 150ft high on elevations #1,2,3,4 on multiple leve

Oct 1, 2008 · Penalty $2,400

Work w/o a permit. noted: a mechanical joist is in use w/o a permit. remedy: obtain a permit or restore premises to prior legal condition.

Oct 1, 2008 · Penalty $400

The dept shall be notified promptly in accordance w/ circumstances of all accidents at construction or demolition sites. noted: hoist faileddroping steel beam on adj roof that was unprotected. remedy: comply w/

Oct 1, 2008 · Penalty $1,600

Work does not conform to approved construction documents or approved amendements. noted: material hoist approved plans shows tiebacks to parapet clan pit is ties back to steal beam w/ single wraps and is missin

Oct 1, 2008

Failure to safeguard all persons and property affected by constructionoperations. noted: there is no roof protection of adj property. while hoisting debris hoist failed dropping steel beams on adj roof. remedy:

Oct 1, 2008 · Penalty $2,400

Work does not conform to approved construction documents and/or approved amendments. noted: there is supported scaffold on sidewalk shed. shed is contrary to plan. as noted in violation #34699735y. the plans

Aug 11, 2008 · Penalty $2,500

Work does not conform to approved construction documents and or approved amendments. noted: the approved plans call for 8inch header beams, 6inch headers are in place. spacing of junior beams call for 24 inches

Aug 11, 2008 · Penalty $2,500

Failure to provide approved accepted plans at job site at time of inspection. noted there is supported scaffold on a side walkshed there are no plans available for inspection. remedy: provide plans.

Aug 9, 2008 · Penalty $250

Provision:27-1015. approved scaffold drawings not available on site as required. stop work order issued: no.393

Apr 21, 2008 · Penalty $200

Sec-26-252 no permit for sidewalk shed note:sidewalk shed constructed is not the same approved in plan by engineer noted:1)change in height not reflected in plan 2)change in footings not reflected in plan 3)cha

Mar 6, 2008

Using hoisting equipment in an unsafe manner insufficient counterweights

Nov 21, 2007 · Penalty $4,000

Failure to safeguard public & property affected by construction operations noted:gut rehab on 8th,9th & 1oth fl including roof repair where as tarps are present covering parapets which were held down by counter

Sep 28, 2007 · Penalty $1,000

Work w/o permit wor noted ar=t apt 3a.erection of new partition wall 12'- 0' in height & removal of demolished walls debris from apt.remedy:obtain permit or restore to prior legal conditions.

Jul 16, 2007

Work does not conform to approved plans.non conforming work noted @9th& 10th fl extra flooring removed from bays between columns"middle section"under application #104471028.stop all work on 9th & 10th fl only

Apr 23, 2007 · Penalty $2,500

Failure to submit a fourth round technical report: periodic inspectionof exterior walls and appurtenances as required by local law 10 of 1980 and the department of buildings rules and regulations. remedy:

May 13, 1998 · Penalty $2,500

Failure to file an amended round three report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y 32-03b (5), indicating correction of hazardous condition described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an

Aug 5, 1997 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended round three report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an

Jun 10, 1997 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amend round three report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03b(5). indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll 10/80 report.

Mar 19, 1997 · Penalty $500

Failure to fil ean amended report acceptable top this department pursuant to cule r c n y 32-03b 5 indicating corrections of hazardous remdy file an amended report following remidal repairs of the subject premi

Jan 9, 1997 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.ny 32-03 b (5) indicating corrections of hazardous condition described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended re

Nov 18, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03 b (5) indicating correction of hazardus conditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended re

Oct 7, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03 b (5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended re

Aug 19, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report accepable to this department punsuant to rule r c n y 32-03 b 5 indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in intial ll10/80 report remedy file an amended report

Jul 8, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable tothis department punsuant to rule r c n y 32-03b 5 indicating correction of harandous conditions described in initial ll1080 report remedy file an amended report fo

May 30, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable tothis department punsuant to rule r c n y 32-03 b5 indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll1080 report remedy file an amended report fo

Apr 11, 1996 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this dept pursuant to rule r.c.n.y 32-03 b(5) indicating correction of hax conditions described in initial ll10/80 report.remedy:file amend report following remed

Mar 11, 1996 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended reprot acceptalble to this department pursuant to rula r.c.n.y 32-03 b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in unitial ll 1080 report remedy: file an amended re

Jan 12, 1996 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03 b(5) indicating correction of hazardous condition described in initial ll 10/80 report remedy:file an amended repo

Oct 25, 1995 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this dept,pursuant to rule r.c.n.y 32-03 b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll10/80 report following remed: file an amended

Sep 25, 1995 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this dept,pursuant to rule r.c.n.y 32-03 b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described initial ll10/80 report.remedy:file an amended report followi

Jul 27, 1995 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursu-ant to rule r.c.n.y 82-03b(5) indicating correction of hazardous cond-itions decsribed in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended-

May 30, 1995 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-o3b(5) indicating correction of hazardousconditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an ----

Mar 30, 1995 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursu-ant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03b(5) indicating correction of hazardous con-ditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended

Feb 9, 1995 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department puzvant to rule r.c. n.y.32-03bl5 indicating correction of hazardous canditions described in mitial ll10/80 report.remedy:file an amended r

Dec 29, 1994 · Penalty $5,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-036(5) indicating correction of hazardousconditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an

Oct 11, 1994 · Penalty $500

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32.03b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in intial ll10/80 report. remedy:file an amended repor

Aug 1, 1994 · Penalty $1,000

Failure to file an amended report acceptable to this department pursuant to rule r.c.n.y. 32-03b(5) indicating correction of hazardous conditions described in initial ll10/80 report. remedy: file an amended re

Jul 15, 1994 · Penalty $500

Failure to submit a third round technical report:periodic inspection of exterior wall and appurtenances as required by local law 10 of 1980 and the department of buildings rules and regulations. remedy: file th

Jun 29, 1994 · Penalty $500